Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Vitaliy Sachko vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sachko vs Cerundolo analysis and find out who is favored!
Vitaliy Sachko vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sachko 1 - 0 Cerundolo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sachko has won 49.39% of points on their second serve, while Cerundolo has won 50.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sachko, in recent form, has won 49.88% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cerundolo has won 54.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.84% and 34.49% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sachko has saved 59.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cerundolo has saved 50.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sachko has won 51.85% of matches played (W/L 28/ 26), with Cerundolo winning 47.62% (W/L 30/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sachko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 55/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Cerundolo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 207/ 121), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Sachko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19), where as Cerundolo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.28% of matches (W/L 20/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sachko winning 1 times and Cerundolo being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sachko winning 2 and Cerundolo winning 0. The last match between Sachko and Cerundolo was at the Lima Challenger, 25-11-2020, Second, Clay with Vitaliy Sachko getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:32.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sachko and Cerundolo have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sachko winning 0 times and Cerundolo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sachko winning 0, and Cerundolo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sachko has played against opponents with an average rank of 257.74 while Cerundolo has played against players with an average rank of 281.59.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sachko has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cerundolo has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sachko has converted 41.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cerundolo has converted 46.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
195
Rank
156
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
178
Rank
79
High
22
Age
L
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
58% (304-220)
Career Total W/L
61% (216-138)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
48% (15-16)
$154,400
Career Prize Money
$392,575
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Vitaliy Sachko | Juan Manuel Cerundolo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:32 | 1:41:32 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (45/69) | 68% (44/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (31/45) | 52% (23/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (10/24) | 48% (10/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (32/65) | 41% (28/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Vitaliy Sachko | Juan Manuel Cerundolo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 48% (15/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (14/19) | 51% (37/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (159/166) | 51% (328/317) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 52% (15/14) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 48 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 91 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:50 | 1:41:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 350.8 | 261.77 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (678/1089) | 63% (1224/1941) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (435/678) | 63% (772/1224) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (203/411) | 50% (360/717) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (45/109) | 46% (103/222) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (412/1035) | 42% (858/2036) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 50% (4/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 50% (10/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (6/13) | 52% (15/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 67% (18/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 33% (18/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 23% (13/3) |
Vitaliy Sachko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
48%
(
46 of
95)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
93)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
65%
(
32 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
30 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
104
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
6
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
6
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Norbert Gombos
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
44%
(
36 of
82)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
37
Total Points Won
26
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Francesco Passaro
63%
(
77 of
122)
1st Serve %
77%
(
89 of
116)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
51 of
89)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
52 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
116)
123
Total Points Won
115
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Tristan Lamasine
65%
(
79 of
121)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
53 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve %
67%
(
10 of
15)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
20
Total Points Won
11
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Juan Manuel Cerundolo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(2) 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Sandro Kopp
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Gabriel Diallo
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
77%
(
74 of
96)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Federico Salomone
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
84 of
115)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sachko Vs Cerundolo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Vitaliy Sachko
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
